Que Pasa USA by Mystic Angel
 
October 2012
1IKEA Regrets Women Erased From Saudi Catalog
2Kentucky restaurant shut down after roadkill found in kitchen
3Life-Saving Secrets from Surgeons
4After the debate debacle for Obama, we’ll find out if we have a race
5Romney Goes On Offense, Pays For It In First Wave Of Fact Checks
6It's the Great Pumpkin Spice Latte Shortage, Starbucks fans
7This can’t be safe: Virginia Tech player finds scissors on the field (VIDEO)
81 Man Dead of a Heart Attack, 3 Arrested After Hotel Wedding Brawl in City of Brotherly Love
9Jerry Sandusky sentenced to 30 to 60 years in prison on 45 counts of child molestation
10Heaven is real, says neurosurgeon who claims to have visited the afterlife
11Giant 'mystery eyeball' discovered on South Florida beach
12Groundbreaking study: Aronia, curcumin extracts effectively kill brain cancer cell line Learn more:
13Body found in Colorado is that of missing girl Jessica Ridgeway, authorities confirm
14 52 Things You Can Do for Transgender Equality
15Florida's giant eyeball mystery solved: It belonged to a swordfish
16Fungal Meningitis Outbreak: Who's At Risk?
17Penn State cheerleader’s fall and brain injury brings campus together in prayer
18Face-Off: CVS vs. Walgreens
19Does Romney Have an In-Law Problem?
20Biden Says Crying Baby Knows What Romney Win Would Bring
21Mass shooting reported in Wisconsin: 7 hospitalized, suspect remains at large, police say
22What Obama and Romney will say about Libya, China and Iran—and what’s the truth
23FACT CHECK: Flunking geography, history
24Richard Mourdock Isn't Alone: Politicians Weigh In On Rape (VIDEO)
251 dead, 4 hospitalized in car crash (VIDEO)
26Tax Policy Center in Spotlight for Its Romney Study
27Women who knew 'cannibal cop' worried they were on his 'cook list'
28‘Slut-Shamed’ Staten Island Teen Tweets ‘I Give Up’ Before Jumping In Front of Subway Train
29Eastern US braces for dangerous superstorm
30President Obama Vs Mitt Romney On Hurricane Sandy
31Paralympian Josh Sundquist has best Halloween costume ever
Tax Policy Center in Spotlight for Its Romney Study
October 26, 2012

Anything this twit touches is FAIL!

*******

WASHINGTON — A small nonpartisan research center operated by professed “geeks” has found itself at the center of a rancorous $5 trillion debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney.

No white paper or policy manifesto put out during the presidential campaign has proved more controversial than an August study by the Washington-based Tax Policy Center, a respected nonprofit that issues studiously detailed tax analyses.

That study found, in short, that Mr. Romney could not keep all of the promises he had made on individual tax reform: including cutting marginal tax rates by 20 percent, keeping protections for investment income, not widening the deficit and not increasing the tax burden on the poor or middle class. It concluded that Mr. Romney’s plan, on its face, would cut taxes for rich families and raise them for everyone else.

The detailed paper proved kindling for a political firestorm. Mr. Romney criticized the center as performing a “garbage-in, garbage-out” analysis and his campaign accused it of partisan bias. The Obama campaign used the center’s numbers to argue that Mr. Romney had proposed a $5 trillion tax cut. Economists jumped on the bandwagon too, flinging analyses back and forth and picking apart the projections and assumptions in the report.

At the Tax Policy Center itself, responses ranged from irritation at the partisan nature of some attacks to incredulity over the political hysteria. “There was this résumé-hunting, White-House-visitor-log” searching feel to the response, said the center’s director, Donald Marron, a former Bush administration economist. “That was unanticipated,” he added dryly.

In many ways the report did just what the center was created to do: inject some solid numbers into a shifty, accusatory, raucous political debate. The decade-old center — a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, two nonpartisan grandes dames of the Washington world — was founded precisely to “fill that niche,” Mr. Marron said.

“A lot of tax policy discussions are — how to describe them? — people yelling at each other,” he said. “We believe that good information leads to better policy discussions and ultimately better policy outcomes.”

The center’s claim to provide reliable, nonpartisan information comes in part from its staff makeup. It has about four dozen affiliated staff members and scholars — most are economists, several are considered top experts in their fields, and a number have experience in either Republican or Democratic administrations.

It also is derived by virtue of its ownership of a highly sophisticated tax modeling system, one that took about two years to build and has a small coterie of specialists to tend it. The model resembles those used by government offices to forecast the effect of changes to the tax code, and it relies on about 150,000 anonymous tax returns and a wealth of data on pensions, education, consumer expenditures and economic growth.

“They’re one of the few groups that have this very big, very accurate model,” said Martin A. Sullivan, the chief economist and a contributing editor at Tax Analysts, a specialty publisher. “What they’re doing is just making the best computations available” for others to interpret, he said.

That includes so-called distributional analyses that show how changes to the tax code would change the relative burden on high-income and low-income families — a dry tax topic yet one of the most politically potent ones of the campaign, given the broader debate about tax fairness and inequality.

The analysis of the Romney proposal has proved highly controversial not just among politicians, but also among some economists.

Researchers including Martin Feldstein of Harvard and Harvey S. Rosen of Princeton have argued that Mr. Romney’s tax math might work if he raised taxes on families making more than $100,000 a year — not $200,000 to $250,000 a year, as he currently promises — or if his plan gave a strong jolt to economic growth.

“Reasonable economists disagree on” the growth effects of plans like Mr. Romney’s, said Alan J. Auerbach, a tax expert at the University of California, Berkeley, who added that he did not see the math working out as currently described. “It matters a lot what kind of reductions you’re making or how you’re paying for tax cuts.”

Others have argued that the Tax Policy Center filled in too many of the holes in Mr. Romney’s light-on-detail proposal — making a full analysis impossible and skewing the center’s paper’s results.

“It is not an analysis of Governor Romney’s plan,” said Scott A. Hodge, the president of the Tax Foundation. a nonprofit research group also based in Washington.

“It has been, I think, mislabeled as such and misinterpreted as such. We don’t think there are enough details to analyze,” he said, adding that he believed that it was possible to devise a distributionally neutral, revenue neutral tax reform that cut rates in the way Mr. Romney described.

The Tax Policy Center said that it had sought as many details as possible from the Romney campaign. (Its economists said it has a cordial back-and-forth with the economic policy teams in both campaigns, as it did in 2008.) Given the numbers available, it had tried to perform the analysis in the most generous way possible, and still did not see how Mr. Romney’s rate cuts could square with his other goals.

“We wrote a technical, accurate paper given the available information,” said William G. Gale of the Brookings Institution, one of the paper’s main authors, in a recent interview. “The criticism that you can’t analyze the Romney tax plan because there isn’t one? That hasn’t stopped other economists from analyzing its growth effects. I like to have substantive discussions about tax policy. The uproar about the paper has not been substantive.”

Many economists across the political spectrum have said they found the report’s conclusions convincing, like Alan D. Viard, a tax expert at the right-of-center American Enterprise Institute.

Mr. Sullivan of Tax Analysts said: “I like tax reform. I want to broaden the base. It’s something I’ve devoted my life to. And I welcome Governor Romney and the Republicans’ strong push, but the plan doesn’t work out. It’s not mathematically possible.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tax-policy-center-spotlight-romney-173604062.html
Join Now!
Home
My-Journal.com
Sign in
FAQ
Help

May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
November 2015
September 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012

   
Login to select
your favorite journals

PrevTopNext
 



© Website Copyright 2012 by My-Journal.com
© Journal Content Copyright 2012 by the Author
 
Terms of Service Agreement
 
Privacy Policy