Today is August 16, 2022
Join Now! | Home | Sign in | FAQ | Help
Zord's Underground Archive by Zord
 
April 2016
1ARCHIVE ENTRY ONE.....
2ARCHIVE ENTRY TWO
3ARCHIVE ENTRY THREE
4ARCHIVE ENTRY FOUR
5ARCHIVE ENTRY FIVE
9SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT!
11Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)
12Selections From Old SYNTHESIS Website, Sadly, Now Defunct.....
13SYNTHESIS II
14To Worship The Funeral.....
15Some Works From My Youth......
16THE DECLINE OF AMERICA
17DADA NIHILIS LE FLEUR
18NATIONAL ANARCHISM AND THE STATE
21Alexander Dugin: Magus And Mad Prophet!
22NO, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANNOT COUNT ON MY VOTE!
23UNCONVENTIONAL WEAPONS AND WORLD POWERS
24Is Vladimir Putin The Chakravartin?
25BARACK OBAMA LORD OF APOCALYPSE!
26The Myth Of SRA, Psychotronics, And The Global Reality Grid
27BERNIE NEEDS OUR HELP!
30SANDERS VICTIM OF DNC/HILLARY CLINTON'S DIRTY TRICKS!


April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016

DADA NIHILIS LE FLEUR
April 17, 2016





In recondite realms of primeval oblivion,
Unmanifest darkness of dimensions unknown,
Oceans of gods, screaming their minions,
Beyond the pale light of mortality shown.

The Worlds and their order but a feeble veneer,
A razor-thin sheath over abysses of black,
Soon to burst like a Nova in the mind of the Seer,
When the Lords of Chaos have found their way back.

Loki to scream through the tabernacle's shrine,
Overturning the faith of the feeble Nazarene,
The gods upon the Flesh of the Universe shall dine,
The Void's splendor consuming the earths once so green.

Ragnarok come forth!! Let the Old Ones Return!
We await the dark breath of the Savage Dawn!
The Universe unveiled as the Stage that now burns,
A path now unraveled; that we never were on!!





THROUGHOUT human history we have been preoccupied by the quest for meaning. This has generally taken the form of the attempted synthesis, as well as the antithesis of two contradictory world-views: Idealism and Nihilism.

Some systems, like Buddhism, have attempted to incorporate both ideas; stressing the harmony of the Universe, while also reflecting the desire to go beyond Samsara, or conditioned and phenomenal existence. Generally Idealism and Nihilism have been opposing schools of thought, particularly in the West. The underlying error in these views is the upholding of a world-view and a universal, general hypotheses as absolute in itself. The error of metaphysics is its love for sweeping generalities that anthropomorphically project relative tapestries of intellection upon the whole Macrocosm, and hold them not to be descriptive of the Macrocosm, but capturing its actual essence. Symbolism usually supplants the reaches where intellect cannot go, but always presupposing the underlying theoretical bias of one Magus or another. I hold that there is value in both Idealistic and Nihilistic systems, but I also see a fatal flaw in both. The general that excludes the relative and yet imposes itself in the relative is the worst kind of illusion, that leads to contradictions and absurdities which intrude themselves into virtually every foundational idea of whatever system it is proposing. The fault lies in the epistemological limits of the human mind.
II.

What is knowledge, and how does one know? Are you separate from what you know? Does what you know perhaps have just as much bearing on who you are as much as what you are in relation to the field of knowledge that it represents; in how you effect it? Are you an object to your thoughts, and do your thoughts experience themselves as entities in themselves and see you as a matrix or process of ideas, in the same way as you see them as your thoughts? Do you really know anything? Or are you also known by and through what you know, and this process of participation in living monads of knowledge is what gives you the possibility of knowing in any sense, due to the fact that you interact with the dialectics of metaphysical knowledge, and apart from this interaction, you really know nothing? Does knowing nothing actually create the process through which you are known by, as, and through what you know; and thus knowledge knowing of you thus gives itself to you to maintain the integrity of the process of consciousness? Who is anyone to philosophise? We can only think our own thoughts to the degree that they think us. We do not own them, they are not us. We are in a partnership with cognition. Start pushing thoughts around and they will flee and laugh at you when you start sounding stupid! The problem with human cognition is its sense of rigidity in the realm of ideas. Even symbolic thinking does not free one from the reflective matrix of the human mind, which can only know in relation to contrast and relativity. In fact, knowledge is relativity, the Universe is relative, and though it may or may not be reflective of the Absolute, it cannot really express it either in thesis or antithesis, much less synthesis. The map is not the territory. Absolute truth is Un-Manifest, totally beyond anything that can be conceived of, even Infinity. It cannot be applied to the Universe, or ideas about the Universe. All we can do as humans is develop our own relative approach to what we discern is our own relationship with Ultimate Reality. I myself made the same error in projecting Nihilism as the Absolute Truth of Existence, at one time. But how could it be when there are some people who exist, lead happy lives and for whom Nihilism is a dark chimera of unreality, in the same way that their passport to 'La La Land' to me looks unreal. One could say perhaps that Nihilism has more objective proof in the world than Idealism, due to the evil of the world, thus Nihilism is more empirically valid. This is a far cry from being an Absolute, however. Esoteric studies are good, but at best they are useful lies which are helpful to certain people for certain reasons. No doubt the Black Arts are a science of illusion, thus useful in the manipulation of illusion. But the Universe is a relative mosaic of illusion, where things and processes are only real in relation to other things and processes, and wherein nothing is real in itself; i.e. No-thing is real in itself, but Nothing is real in itself. The meaning of the Universe is that it has no meaning apart from what meaning you give it, and it may be anxiously waiting to see what you come up with. Who knows? You have a grid of conceptions, experiences, and environmental impressions that determine not only your ephemeral identity and reality feedback system, but also whether any given esoteric truth is true for you. No truth is universal and absolute; there will always be a context in which some truth will be untrue for somebody. It is absurd to think that some liquids can burn, but acid does. It is crazy to think that water flows upwards, but the surrounding structure can make this happen, or if the water has magnetic properties responding to magnetism. There are always qualifiers of physical laws, they are relative. How much more true is this in the realm of thought and belief? So for a moment, put your books aside, and try to look into yourself and find out what you mean. When you look into the vast emptiness within and without, with due humility, you will forge the dynamic between Nihilism and Identity. And like a tightrope-walker, cross to the other shore of what you have created as yourself.




In Humble Dedication:





















 
Login to select
your favorite journals

PrevTopNext
 
 


© Website Copyright 2016 by My-Journal.com
© Journal Content Copyright 2016 by the Author
 
Terms of Service Agreement
 
Privacy Policy